ERP production orders
MAPP ADEPT — a schedule the line can actually achieve.
MAPP ADEPT transforms planning and scheduling using an intelligent OEE-driven engine — building plans against measured capability rather than nominal machine rates.
Plans built on nominal rates fail on contact with the shift.
Most schedules assume every machine runs at its rated speed with no changeover overrun and no unplanned stops. Reality delivers something else, and by mid-shift the plan is being managed informally on a whiteboard.
A scheduling engine that knows each asset's actual OEE produces plans that hold — and flags realistically when they will not.
OEE-aware by design. ADEPT schedules against the performance MAPP EYE measures, so capacity assumptions are grounded in what the line has actually delivered.
Measured line capability
Planned maintenance windows
Executable line-level schedule
What MAPP ADEPT does.
AI-assisted scheduling
Sequencing suggestions that account for changeover cost, due dates and measured line capability.
Line-level scheduling
Plans built at the resolution work is actually executed, not just at plant level.
ERP order syncing
Production orders imported from ERP automatically, with WIP status written back.
Real-time updates
The schedule reacts to what is happening on the floor rather than describing the morning's intentions.
What-if analysis
Test the impact of a rush order, a breakdown or an extra shift before committing to it.
Load balancing
Work distributed across available lines and work centres to avoid artificial constraints.
WIP updates to ERP
Progress reported upward continuously so planning and sales see reality, not yesterday.
Schedule adherence analytics
Measurement of how closely execution followed the plan, and why it did not.
What planning gains.
- Schedules that survive contact with the shift
- Changeover overhead reduced through better sequencing
- Rush orders assessed against real capacity before being promised
- Maintenance windows planned rather than absorbed as downtime
- Sales and planning working from live WIP instead of yesterday's report
- Adherence measured, so planning quality can actually improve
Looking for something else?
How often does your plan survive the shift?
If the honest answer is "rarely", the assumption behind the plan is usually the problem.